Posts Tagged ‘Ofqual’

Ofsted and Ofqual Prove to Be Off Target In Educational Role

Wednesday, June 20th, 2012

The provision of educational inspectorates in our schooling system has a clear mandate; to police systems, procedures and standards in our academic establishments. A clear and responsible duty but sadly Ofsted and Ofqual have erred on their respective duties much to the dismay of our teaching resources, parents and students.

With around 33,000 schools, 450, 000 teachers and 12.5m school children the stakes are high. Get it right and the UK educational standards can be judged to be safely improving as we would all wish and frankly expect. Get it wrong and the system falls into disrepute at the speed of light. It would be crass to assume something as vast as our educational schooling can run itself; there are too many factors involved. It therefore becomes a basic integer of a sound educational system that the checks and balances of the schooling system are steadfast and effective. We owe this to the students.

Yet we still struggle to maintain effective control. Successive Secretaries of State for Education have come and gone with desperately short tenures. Heads of Ofsted, the independent educational inspectorate, have started their tour of duty with high expectations and equal frustrations. Many have been recruited from the teaching profession, adopting the poacher turned gamekeeper role. And they certainly have a job to complete. The challenge is enormous. To achieve any success the head of Ofsted must possess the steadfast ability to challenge the government and motivate the teaching profession. Get it wrong and the Ofsted head is seen as a pariah by the teaching profession and an outcast by the government. It takes a brave unwavering soul to succeed.

Chris Woodhead some 18 years ago accepted the challenge. He, unlike his many processors could see a strategy to make a change. He gained acceptance from teachers and challenged the department for education whom he accused of failing to maintain the progressive educational standards our children needed. He achieved notoriety rather than outright success. In the end the system beat him. He retired frustrated still full of ideas and criticisms that harangue the system even today. Sir Michael Wilshaw the current head of Ofsted has an equally daunting task. The system hasn’t improved that much. Educational standards are still falling. Children are still subjected to manipulation of academic criteria and results induced by the dreaded achievement of  targets. The Ofsted inspections are loathed rather than welcomed. And to cap it all Ofsted have been discovered to have been deploying cut and paste report writing tactics that would fail any student for plagiarism.

The biggest problem lies in the need to police the educational system. Simplistically the values and experience of Ofsted do not seem to be passed on. Sir Michael Wilshaw proved himself to be an exceptional head teacher in an inner city school that was ailing and failing. By the time he left Mossbourne academy in Hackney, London, its achievements were inspirational. The real benefit to our schooling system and the teaching profession would be to capture this knowledge and ability and project it as a positive function to head teachers and government departments. The inspectorate function of Ofsted should be handled by a separate team less it detracts from these positive opportunities. Instead we learn more of negative reports of the exploits of Ofsted; dawn raids, plagiarised inspection reports, school inspection shenanigans with poor teachers being given the day off, disruptive children being taken out for the day. We such scurrilous activity we obviously need a school police force. But this should be a different entity to the role Sir Michael could play in demonstrating how teachers could act to excel. A master class from an obvious master freed from the clutter and criticism that surrounds the structure of the current role.

The third element of our schooling structure should focus on curriculum development. Enough of the lowered exam standards leeched into the system by Ofqual resulting in inadequate commercial relevance and restrictions in the scope open to teachers. But this needs to be led by a Secretary for Education who is in the role for the long term. Rumours now abound that Michael Gove may shortly be moved to a new role in the cabinet and yet another short term Minister will take over and attempt to reorganise our educational process in the 18 months they are in the role. We owe our children a sound, relevant and high quality standard of education that can match or better the standards in the global market. A league table the UK is slipping down badly with little hope of a trend reversal without a radical review of the role Ofsted and Ofqual should play.

Educational Exams Made Too Easy Admits Ofqual

Wednesday, May 2nd, 2012

School GCSE and A level results too easy

A further revelation by Ofqual the school exam regulator has repercussions with parents, schools, universities and employers. Most importantly it will demoralise the children involved. For years the flood of criticism over falling standards that emerged each year as the exam results were published were quashed by Ofqual. Now, suddenly, they have issued a statement saying that the exams had become “less taxing.”

We all like to pass exams and if they are made easier most candidates would welcome the accolade of a pass rather than queering the structure. But the past can catch up. Many students entering higher education are struggling with the increase in academic standard required. Employers have stated the standards are too low to be viable in industry and many new recruits need retraining to catch up. But most important of all we operate in a global market. The recession in the UK could take years to resolve. Young adults could be forced to seek employment overseas and consequently realise that their qualifications are like junk bonds with little or no value.

Ofqual has clearly failed in their remit to maintain examination quality. Not only have they let countless thousands of children down who must now reflect on the true worth of their certificates, there is another time bomb waiting to explode. The government has just announced the potential to pay teachers’ differential salaries based on results. Already school league tables are the subject of some concern but the fact they are reliant on suspect data now presents a whole new mess to resolve, and hopefully, not by the body that created it or failed to own up to their mistake.

A Level Educational Exams Redesigned To Improve Learning

Sunday, April 29th, 2012
A Level exams to be redesigned

A Level Exams to be Redesigned

The quest to improve educational exam results and avoid manipulation, which is ultimately self-defeating, has focused on A levels content. Universities have revealed that the improvement in A levels pass rates has not been evident in the ability of first year students on degree courses.

Glenys Stacey, chief executive of the exam regulator Ofqual has said that the current format for A levels which divides the course into four modules should be scrapped. Instead they would be replaced by the conventional approach of examining a student’s understanding of the content through end of course exams.

This move would avoid the current trend to skimp on the opportunity to gain a deeper understanding of a subject matter that occurs when the course is more homogeneous. Ofqual also believes the end of course approach avoids the enticement of exam resits to improve a grade. There is a further benefit of restructuring the content of the exams that will allow them to match the requirements of university degree course.

The average students’ knowledge in a subject area has been shown to have grown wider but shallower over the past 15 years. A level exam results also reflect a growing influence by teachers who have become more skilled in grooming students to pass exams. The changes in the academic structure are designed to better match the needs of universities and also those students who leave education to enter employment. Michael Gove, secretary of state for education has requested that Ofqual redesign A levels with the involvement acof universities from 2014. All we need now is for the same approach to be taken for SAT’s and GCSE’s which could both benefit from the involvement of the institutions that are about to receive the student.

School Children Exam Results Contain Errors

Monday, October 4th, 2010

Despite 600 children ploughing their through  an effective teaching programme at school, the resources were wasted when their A Level and GCSE exam results were wrongly marked. Ofqual have hauled the exam board involved, AQA, over the coals and tasked to rectify the errors. Although AQA, the largest exam marking board in England are repentant the real question is whether these results have materially affected the children’s prospects? See more at the BBC

Examinations Are Made Too Easy To Appease Authorities Not Children

Monday, August 16th, 2010

Every child likes to pass GCSE and A level exams to demonstrate ability, recognition of a job well done in school and as a precursor to a job in industry or place in university. But many observers believe we are lowering the educational relevance by playing games with the standards. In advance of the results due out this week along with the inevitable flood of angst, perhaps now is the time to scrap the GCSE and A level grades and replace them with examinations matched to the needs of universities and industry.

A notable critic from the world of science and chemistry believes too many people have vested interests in maintaining low educational standards.  Dr. Richard Pike, chief executive of the Royal Society of Chemistry, condemns politicians, examination bodies, schools and educational quangos of collectively lowering the educational standards.  He believes corporate bodies do not want to upset middle class parents who recognise exam results as a primarily measure of society’s expectations rather than true academic performance.

Many schools, hounded by league tables, see quantity rather quality as their prime objective.  Although the exam regulators have twice recently attempted to install tougher GCSE exams through the examination bodies little has been enforced. Proving educational quangos have little real benefit or clout Dr Pike believes the needs of universities and industry has failed to be incorporated in the curriculum. “This is not a broken system that has to be fixed it is a corrupt edifice that must be razed to the ground and rebuilt” he said.

Stern words from an eminent leader in the science educational world.  If we accept the future destiny requires the UK to evolve in a rapidly changing world such significant observations from the likes of Dr. Pike cannot be ignored.  Criticism of the standard of GCSE and A levels has been widespread for years, yet little corrective action has been achieved.  No wonder, if school league tables and parental expectations continue to be the focus rather than the demands of industry, we are unlikely we can expect change.  This will be a disaster. To continue as we are we would end up with every child being awarded a grade A in all subjects – just by being there.

The GCSE and A level results could end up as a junk bond; a worthless qualification and as much use as the MBA degree offered on line in two weeks.  The exam boards such as Edexcel, although willing to work with Ofqual to get the balance right, need to review their position.  Rather than maintaining  a conciliatory position and clearly floundering in their duties they must opt to take a fundamental leadership role.
A significantly higher qualification standard needs to be introduced. We cannot afford to let universities and industry criticise the standard and relevance of the exams. We at keen2learn believe this move needs expediency.  Many children parents may reel at the significance of such a move, but the changes in global employment opportunities may otherwise leave our children out in the cold. We need a Department of Education that strategically has the courage to seize the initiative and adopt the moves to introduce the changes quickly despite the cost cutting era we are in.  We are duty bound to provide our children with continuing education that is fit for purpose and  avoid the continuation of the faltering soft option where exam questions can be answered by reading yesterday’s newspaper.

DCSF Plan To Boost Science and Engineeing Education Has Goal Post Moved

Monday, March 1st, 2010

It seems incredible that a concerted plan by the DCSF to encourage children into science and engineering education is condemmed by an adjustment in GCSE marks.

Teachers, schools and children are on the lookout for disappointing exam results as thousands of GCSE results are to be marked down. The reason, too many have children have improved their grades. This  form of undisclosed handicapping holds some merit in levelling the field towards a higher standard, but the timing of the disclosure leaves a lot to be desired in the motivational stakes.

Whilst we are attempting to generate interest in these subjects, building towards a better resource base for the UK., it is crass to slap the initiative in the face with an unannounced manipulative approach in the exams. It will serve to dispirit kids and convince them to switch  back to the soft subject options. We will end up with a country of media studies students. The in-fight bewteen the various exam authorities; Ofqual, OCR, AQA and Edexcel may prove that there are too many cooks in the kitchen and not enough science and engineering students.

Quick Search

Advanced search help

Twitter Facebook YouTube Google+ Follow Me on Pinterest

Email Signup

for News and Product Updates

SSL
We're listed on ShopSafe Verified by visa