Archive for the ‘Opinion’ Category

STEM Education and Careers Still Need Boost By Governments

Thursday, October 20th, 2011

The USA sees a critical shortfall looming in science, technology, engineering and maths (STEM) skills being taught in school. These essential skills are needed to support the engineering and science initiatives of the future. But the lack of performance in this key area of the curriculum is worrying major manufacturers and medical companies who fear a reduced intake of the engineers scientists of tomorrow.

The turnaround to influence children in school supported by the intrigue from viable science and engineering projects can take years to accomplish. The clock is ticking away whilst schoolchildren review their options and the current  recession is certainly not helping. Children no longer see employment as a natural conclusion to their education. University degrees now carry a fee burden equivalent to a first time mortgage and the vast majority of children now face the real predicament of either earning money or debt at the start to their adult career.

We need to influence children in the key roles in which they could potentially prosper. STEM careers could be the answer. Not only would this induce creativity in design and operation, a budding scientist or engineer could be at the centre of wealth development for themselves, their employers and the nation. This is especially relevant in countries  seeing manufacture migrate to the Far East. It is no wonder that a cold sweat is appearing on the brows of governments, higher educational authourites  and key manufactures such as Lockheed – Martin and Ingersol Rand. The advent of the STEM summit in 2012 next June in Dallas, and the activities in the UK have to make science and engineering outrank other interests. Most importantly they need to ensure children see this a a key career for the future; something many governments still have to work on. More

UK Education Fails to Match Progress in Science and Technology

Wednesday, October 12th, 2011

One of the most startling revelations of modern Britain is the overall decline in educational achievement. Whilst science and medicine expand their horizons our teaching resources in both primary secondary state schools continue to fail to thrive. Despite the investment of billions of pounds by successive governments the department of education has become a very poor example of educational achievement on the world stage.

Recent developments at CERN indicate that science is constantly re-evaluating itself. The thought that Einstein’s theory where nothing can travel faster than the speed of light could be proven wrong may be unthinkable, yet science is now being turned on its head. Physics as we knew it is witnessing fundamental laws that are now being rewritten. Yet in the world of education and schooling practices over the same time frame we seem to have achieved so little.

In the last 10 years technology, the internet, mobile communications and computers have all established paradigm shifts in performance and applications whilst our overall achievement in state schooling has not. Certainly the skill base in teaching has remained intact but we haven’t seen the equivalent mould-breaking breakthrough in pedagogy. I believe there are parallels in medicine. Whilst medical science has progressed in research and treatments an article in the Times (12th Oct 2011) reveals certain breakthroughs in bowel cancer surgery established by a leading professor in surgery 20 years ago remain unadopted by the National Health Service despite the significant improvement in its success compared to current practice. Central government bodies are the common denominator both in the NHS and in state schools education.

Whilst constantly introducing bureaucratic controls from the top down, motivating inspirational development at the coalface is stifled. Teachers and head teachers appear emasculated in their very own area of expertise. The policy to apply singular focus on attaining targets has thwarted the radical developments that are needed. Even those external colleges deemed to be researching improvements in teaching concepts have to a large extend fallen by the wayside during the cost cutting culls of the new government.

As a control experiment the expertise in independent schools continues to set the pace. Apart from financial constraints in fees linked with the prevailing market conditions the independent sector is thriving in the quality of schooling offered to children.

The advent of free schools and academies will circumvent the controls of the department of education. This move, heavily promoted by the government and the Secretary of State for Education would seem on the surface to be a bold move to implement change. Freed of Government and local Authority intervention these new schools could provide the breakthrough in focus and practical application in teaching.

It also seems a retrograde step 24 years after the introduction of the National Curriculum and Tony Blair’s battle cry of “Education, Education, Education”. The UK’s approach to excellence is to now to leave schools to their own devices. If this were the case it would appear the better solution would have been to have avoided government intervention in the first place. UK schools, instead of constant criticism, pressure on teachers – many of whom have left the profession and the introduction of countless educational initiatives that have cost billions of pounds to little or no effect, we could have seen 24 years of actual development spearheaded by teachers.

The role of head teacher has largely become administrative dealing with Ofsted and finance. Applications for promotion to head teacher is seen as a retrograde step by many potential candidates believing the job too stressful. Ironically the teaching and motivational skill of the head teacher has been largely lost to administration at the very time it was needed most. If we are to adopt a paradigm shift and claw our way back up the OECD educational league table, where we currently languish in around 25th position in the world, we need some courageous moves by schools. The free schools and academies may show the way. If Eton and Westminster schools who started life as a schools for children from poor families can metamorphosis to their current position of learning excellence so hopefully can our state schools.

Educational Research Found Teachers Enhancing Maths Exam Score

Monday, September 12th, 2011

Our teaching resources in primary and secondary schools are motivated and rewarded by attaining targets. Time in the classroom can be absorbed by the process of selecting the range of children who potentially will generate the maximum points in tests and exams. Gifted children and the slower learner are often discounted by the law of classroom averages.  A recent survey by the Institute Of Education in London (IoE) has shown this can induce teachers to go against their better judgement and play educational games with the learning opportunity of the class especially by manipulating exam results especially it seems, in maths.

The SATs tests and GCSE exam results is proving our overall performance in maths is suspect.  The improved exam results are not only being linked to the potential of an easy exam.  The pass rate may seem to be improving but the quality of learning in maths is often declared mournful and unfit for service.  Numerous captains of industry and commerce claim the standard of maths ability in children seeking employment is woefully inadequate requiring remedial support before school leavers  can start work.

A review of maths tests in the national curriculum has shown children apparently able to add and subtract in their head without understanding the times tables.  On the surface that this would seem a positive achievement, but some teachers, conscious of hitting targets, are manipulating the results.

Children have been so well groomed they can answer many questions without understanding how the answer is actually calculated.  Professor Richard Cowan who completed the study for the IoE said “The goal to have children able to calculate the answer to basic calculations by year three will be unlikely to be achieved without a substantial change in the way children are taught”.

Ironically the incomplete knowledge of maths is not a total stalling point.  Some children can grasp the answer without a thorough understanding of it should be calculated.  The misguided energy involved with attaining targets sacrifices confidence in maths to the detriment of the children and the teachers. Although the IoE survey found the reports on a child’s performance in maths could have been manipulated to meet targets and make the school look better there is a happy medium.  If all children in the class where to feature as the collective measure of teaching proficiency rather that the achievement of targets the incentive to manipulate results will be largely removed.

It seems such a simple enough strategy that is hard to believe this is not the case already. The government initiatives such as “Every child a reader” and “No child left behind” may have stood a better chance if targets had been modified and the whole class, year or school were judged in the statistics. This would reveal the overall merits of a school and indeed a government initiative. At the moment we are playing games by manipulating the figures merely to improve the achievement of a school to get Ofsted off their backs.

Academies and Free Schools Escape Educational Dogma.

Sunday, September 11th, 2011

The clearest indictment that our schooling system is failing comes from the government. The introduction of free schools could be said to be a remedy for the malaise that our schools are facing. The National curriculum, unanimously voted by teachers as the curate’s egg; good in parts, has ailed and failed since its launch in 1987.  Billions of pounds have been invested for scant return. But will new academies and free schools, unfettered by the national curriculum and government scrutiny, be the panacea our schooling system needs, or create confusion our schoolchildren will condemn for generations?

The uptake to seek free schools status seems grossly under-subscribed. Head teachers, hounded by Ofsted inspections, targets, budget cuts and endless government educational initiatives had been expected to grasp this ideal opportunity to opt out.  But the flood of anticipated applications for free school status turned out to be a trickle.  Just 240 schools applied from the expected two to three thousand.  Many were late applications where teachers and school governors fought with the implications of academy or free school status.  Clearly the freedom from government, Ofsted and local education authorities were a huge plus for the schools, but they are not exempt from performing and the thought of going it alone and failing must have been significantly daunting.  Other schools hover on the touch line waiting to see how the first tranche copes. As the new academic year starts many schools are only half full raising concerns over their financial viability.  The new free schools need to attract a minimum number of children to generate their operational budgets from fees paid by the government per child attending.

A further unease is whether the initial enthusiasm to break free prevails. If the right teaching staff are not recruited and retained the chances of a schools’ success will be severely impaired. From the teachers perspective they seek the better performing schools to provide job enrichment and career enhancement.  There is a risk the brand new free school operating without a pedigree will only be able to recruit those teachers willing to take such a risk.

A huge benefit for children attending free schools is the amount of additional learning time involved in the school year.  State schools are contracted to provide 38 weeks of schooling (196 days a year) a year.  Free schools are able to provide up to 51 weeks a year.  The additional learning time is further enhanced by a reduction in the time allocated to exams and the tutoring for exams that occurs generally in state schools preoccupied with the need to hit performance targets.  State schools spend around nine weeks a year in exam tutorials.  Parents may also welcome the longer teaching year giving them financial benefits from reduced childcare costs.

There is a lot of good that can come from the free school concept.  Freed from government intervention and Ofsted policy they can invest more time to the learning process.  Moving with the times rather than national curriculum could produce more rounded students better matched to the education demands of commerce and industry.  But there is a high risk some will fail. The stand-alone structure may cause some to suffer withdrawal symptoms.  This will be a catastrophe for the children involved.

PSHE Educational Games To Help Diffuse Riots

Tuesday, September 6th, 2011

Assiduous changes have affected our society immeasurably. Our children can often feel overlooked and ignored at home and at school. Yet their freedom of speech through social networks and the ability to communicate worldwide at the touch of a button has left some teenagers bewildered. They have significant power to talk yet can be discounted by a society where parents and perhaps teachers fail to keep up with their educational needs in a rapidly changing social environment. Feeling disenfranchised they result to anti social antics which we may abhor yet have been responsible in part for their onset.

Educational initiatives introduced as part of the national curriculum  have predominately failed. The cost of failure has been phenomenal  both financially  and the social impact in school and society. The recent riots have rung the Lutine bell now the aftermath of action and reaction  needs to dealt with effectively. The combination of renewed parental support and educational initiatives must be jointly harnessed. It all cannot be left to Teachers. But there is some help. A fantastic series of discussion cards is available to get that essential conversation going with our youth. Developed by Sue Scott- Horne after a lifetime of experience in dealing with children and young adults they break down barriers and reluctance to talk by introducing the subject in the form of  educational games.

Gang Culture Discussion Cards

Stealing Discussion Cards

Vandalism Discussion Cards

Educational Secretary To Tackle Truancy

Friday, September 2nd, 2011

The current scheme to control and reduce truancy for school is not working. With over the number of children avoiding class clearly there is scope for improvement. Education Secretary Michael Gove revealed that there are over one million children who missed more than 10 per cent of lessons in school each week.

The government are also drawing a connection with the level of truancy, the subsequent loss in education and its effects in the recent riots. The education secretary explained his thinking in a recent speech when Mr Gove said: “We still, every year allow thousands more children to join an educational underclass – they are the lost souls our school system has failed. It is from that underclass that gangs draw their recruits, young offenders’ institutions find their inmates and prisons replenish their cells.”

Our teaching support would need a huge boost in resources to counteract the problem, which is not going to be possible within the current financial constraints in educational budgets. The root cause and effect of a child’s drift to truancy has to be thoroughly understood by the government. There are many with specialist knowledge that must be consulted before any initiative is taken. We cannot afford to let the matter drift on any longer. It not affects the lives of those “lost souls” involved in absconding from school but also the children who suffered the consequences of the associated disruption in class. It is symptomatic of a festering sore in our education system that has defeated numerous educational secretaries. Maybe the cabinet should look to solving the issues in our own society a little than our overseas excursions. more

Schooling Policy In Wales Fail Exams

Monday, August 29th, 2011

This years crop of GCSE and A Level exams taken by children in Wales has shown an alarming decline in performance. This has  stranded many students wanting to take degree courses at university. But the real concern is the change in the educational policy introduced in Wales that abandoned annual exams and tests which monitored learning progress which seems to have created the downfall.

The ideal seemed well founded. Scrap the tests which previously involved extensive periods of grooming and practice in how to pass the exams. Instead allocate this time – estimated at nine weeks per year, towards further learning. The concept seemed ideal, it made logical sense and in theory should have improved the range of education for Welsh children. But something has gone wrong in the equation. By not honing children in exam technique and assessing their performance annually seems to interrupted the ability to pass exams. Results are poorer than in England which maintained the status quo.

The experiment is an eye opener but maybe should not be abandoned wholeheartedly. This pedagogical conundrum need further investigation. The bench mark of exam performance in England is far from  ideal. Exam results have been manipulated by children taking the easier subjects. The need for Maths and the sciences, which could help students in future careers in this changing world, have swapped for and abundance of courses in media studies etc.

Wales had a problem which needs significant soul searching to modify the measured outcome in final exams. The Educational authourities must accept that the educational benefit of allocating those precious nine weeks into learning rather than exam techniques. But for the sake of good order  they also have to come up with a better measure of ability and academic progress. Now is not the time to throw the baby out with the bathwater.   more..the implications for Wales’ school system

School Term At Free Schools Starts With Low Attendance

Monday, August 29th, 2011

The success of the new Free Schools to be run by parents and teachers is off to a wobbly start. These new educational establishments were set to change the face of the our teaching resources in the UK. Freed from the normal controls instilled in the state sector they were heralded by educational secretary Micheal Gove as the way of the future.  But there is a flaw. It required  local parents to take a gamble with these schools with no pedigree and enlist their children. But they are not.

The Free schools are to draw funds from the government based on a fee per student. It is essential these schools have a full compliment to make ends meet. The operating and payroll costs would have set in the budgets assuming a 80 per cent occupancy but some are falling desperately short of their targets. This poses an awful conundrum. No erstwhile teacher will want to work for a reduced salary or even nothing. The chances of the free school taking off during the first critical years will be severely impaired if the better teachers abandon ship and leave. Schools Freed From Educational Authority Could Flounder

The scheme has a further vulnerability. Set up by interested parents they will inevitably have a finite interest. A concern is the whether these parent’s will maintain the operational energy  after their children have moved away from the school, and the headteacher retires. Many a parents group or parent-teacher interface folds when the driving force moves away or their children leave the school. Although their are supposed  safeguards the fallibility of the free school structure is yet to be proven.

The schooling journey of a child is 15 years. This critical time is made perilous enough with government initiatives, many of which fail or are heavily criticised by the teachers who are required to operate them. As the clock moves on interruptions to this valuable learning time lost can never really be recovered. Let us hope that the Free School experiment does not implode and leave countless children stranded by parents who were led to believe it to be a good idea or a solution to the failing local state school.

Are We Learning From Our Mistakes In Education Policy?

Friday, August 26th, 2011

We like to think we’re developing as a nation but as our educational prowess has just taken its annual hammering with the GCSE and Advanced level exam results. Despite the supposed improvement in results much is linked to the popularity of easier subjects. The quality of our teaching resources and schooling system languishes in the “could do better” zone. Such criticism would not merit respect except it comes from the very Head teachers responsible for our children’s education.

Despite state and private education being around for 100’s of years it has fundamentally failed to track with economic, social and technical developments. Countless secretaries of state for education have come and gone. Many leaving behind turmoil and failed educational initiatives that have cost billions of pounds. Their policies have been short-lived, created by short-term government ministers who hold the post for a desperately brief tenure leaving behind confusion, frustration and a deep-seated concern for the future of our children. We are slipping down the international educational league tables at an alarming rate and as yet do not have a concerted policy that can address this trend. Exam Results Reveal failure in Educational System

Accepting the strategic importance of education it seems crass to hand this vital role to a government minister who inevitably is equipped with an Eton and Oxford background. Having therefore benefited from a pinnacle of education being expected to empathise with the overall failings of the education system that serves millions of our children seems remote. Countless schemes and national initiatives have been introduced that are openly criticised and condemned by the very head teachers responsible for their implementation. Failed or abandoned trials leave hundreds of thousands of children stranded or robbed of the education they deserve. The policies cause undue stress within our teaching resources and having a negative influence on new teachers 50 per cent of who abandon the role within five years. This staggering waste of expensive educational resource remains an unresolved indictment of the educational sector.

Key performance indices (KPI) introduced by the bureaucrats to measure performance have been duly manipulated by the more savvy head teachers and clouded the true results and trends. Yet government educational departments busy handling the introduction and measurable the next initiative seems bereft of prior consultation with the unions, colleges and teaching resources. The fate of well meaning radical reforms and learning schemes could be vastly improved and the doomed schemes aborted before they damage our schooling systems.

Above all politicians zest for glory could be muted. As the average tenure of an educational Secretary is around 18 short months they hardly have time to get to grips with the status quo let alone develop and in depth strategic plan.

Our children deserve to be among the best educated in the world. Educational traditions of quality extend back hundreds of years for very few institutions. And over the next 10 years the numbers attending primary school will swell by a further 300,000 children. We have a UK wide problem that should take precedence in government planning. We must invest in these children after all they will run the economic recovery of the UK and replace the government of today, hopefully, from a much wider platform.

Parents Need To Be Behind Real Educational Reform

Tuesday, August 23rd, 2011

Politics and education do not mix leading to a sequence of games played between government, authorities and the teaching resources in schools. A recent report by Steven Brill  summarised his two-year investigation in the USA which he found enormously frustrating.

The worlds of education and politics have been odd bedfellows generating continuous ideological spin that pervades all from early learning to high school. He believes if you repeat a lie often enough you can convince yourself that it is true. State education is failing children and it is not about money or the size of the class but rather who is at the front of class. He believes that parents need to become more involved in the children’s education and refuse to put up with inadequate and failing or inappropriate  educational standards. more

Educational Achievement of Kids Heavily Influenced by Parents

Wednesday, July 20th, 2011

The summer school holidays are looming. Time to wind down and enjoy the time with the children, well at least until they get bored. Education takes a back seat, GCSE’s, A level  exams and SAT tests are all in the past and now is the time to forget about school and get and about with the kids. Ignoring the price hikes applied by every sales company who see you as a captive audience in the now peak travel season this is a marvelous opportunity to kill two birds with one stone. You can overcome boredom by paying educational games especially the  travel games that you and the kids will enjoy together. Importantly they will turn the bored free time into highly rewarding and productive learning that is also, crucially, great fun.

Teachers have ploughed through elements of the national curriculum throughout the year. The law of averages will mean some children will have grasped the lessons extremely well, some will have average understanding and some will have struggled. Doesn’t matter which category any child falls into a little extra help will stimulate the learning progress despite their ability. Keeping the educational flow going is the answer and six or eight weeks of school holiday can be a long time for young grey cells to stagnate.

Some surprising news has also recently emerged. Research indicates  Google is creating a backwards step in learning. Apparently being able to easily Google something reduces the intelligence otherwise required to seek and reason. We are tending to believe that Google has the right and only answer to any question. The ability  for children to seek facts and determine their relevance and accuracy is being lost. Learning from  errors and mistakes is becoming eroded as we begin to lack the exposure to options. We now take the information displayed by Google as gospel, and are heavily  influenced by the ranking and advertisements displayed. If it doesn’t show up in the search engine we are being led to believe nothing else exists which could be relevant to our inquiry.

Similarly we tend to believe that school is the sole arbiter of learning. There is nothing else we as parents should or could do otherwise we could be interfering and undermine the teachers. But ironically this is the exact opposite of the facts. As parents we have  a vital role to play in the continuing schooling of of our children. And the fun activities now available cover the whole spectrum of learning  have a double edged benefit. They help children to practice the lesson content at their own pace, building understanding and speed, and  also provide parents with an insight into the contemporary ability of their child.

Conventional homework tends to be one dimensional. Children predominately find it a chore and difficult to get parents actively involved. Educational games on the other hand provide a fun base for the mutual interaction between parent and child. The games provide a great opportunity to practice the lesson content boosting the learning retention by the child. Turning learning into fun holds huge potential and with the school summer holidays  looming playing some travel games has a double the benefit of having fun learning whilst on the move.

Is The Government Competent Enough To Educate Our Children

Tuesday, July 5th, 2011

One of the few parameters of daily life in which we have little control is education. The disconnect starts in early learning and lasts for the four key stages of the national curriculum. Parents are in effect locked out of the learning process and rely entirely on the teaching resources that are provided by the school. This has little to do with cost allocation and applies for both the state and independent schools sectors.

The only exclusion from this control arises with home schooling where parents can select which maths, English, science learning resources they wish to pursue. The rest of the three million children currently in our primary and secondary schooling system have their educational programme mapped out by the government. The scope, content, timing, tests and examinations determined by a supposedly higher authority that knows best.

Parents are seemingly deemed inadequate to manage the process are left with the daunting task of attempting to select the best school for their children. A decision impeded by the lack of good schools. Post codes lotteries involving catchment areas of good schools become fraught with potential manipulation by both school and parents. And to cap it all the national curriculum enforced in all state schools is openly criticised by teachers who believe it can lack relevance in our fast changing world.

Importantly our examination and SAT testing process have become a travesty. Inaccuracies, manipulation and an annual debate on their relevance and suitability have undermined the exam boards. Despite the concern little has been achieved apart from the Department for Education terminating an overseas supplier multi-million pound contract who carried the can for the 2009 debacle where exam results results were late, poorly marked or lost.

The government has a history of change for change sake. The Secretary of State for education has seen a succession of incumbents for  this strategic role. Ministers with an average tenancy of 18 months are hardly able to formulate and implement a plan before they move on long and way before any new policy can be ratified. Calamitous schemes have been launched costing tens of millions of pounds only to be abandoned five years later. Even the name of the department has changed to suit the latest Minister’s desire to stamp his or her authority on the role. But they certainly try and inevitably start with the name of the department. Recently the Department for Education and Skills became renamed the Department for Schools, Children and Families that ultimately reverted to the aptly named Department for Education in the last government shakeup. Printers reducing new stationery are delirious, teaching resources perhaps less so.

But the real question is if the government are the arbiters of our educational system why have they not cracked the ideal format for our children. Parents and teachers are responsible for the children in their care and perhaps the ideal resource to identify what works and what does not. They are after all responsible for all other decisions in a child’s upbringing. If the educational process  were to be funded by individual families from reduced income tax parents would be far cannier with the pounds and induce more efficient control than has been achieved by central government. After all the billions of pounds invested in government educational schemes over the last ten years  have yet to achieve a marked improvement in the basics of maths, literacy and science. The position of the UK  in the educational world ranking has slipped from the top ten to the mid twenties. We are going backwards in what is an essential need for the nation as we metamorphosise into a new UK  able to compete in the global market without our traditional industries and commerce. We need some bright well-educated children to lead the next generation and frankly take care of the current educational leaders who have failed so far.

USA Fails To Give Consistent Educational Resources To Children

Friday, July 1st, 2011

Despite being one of the world’s leading nations in technology and commerce the USA still has problems with educational standards. With the resources available why does the United States, like the UK, struggle to reflect their  position in global activities in the schooling of children?

A recent review by U.S. Department of Education shows that despite educational reforms there is still a significant inequality in the standards of teaching and educational resources across the nation. The review sample covering 7,000 schools revealed disparity with the number of children receiving inadequate maths schooling especially in algebra and calculus. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan said “The data shows that far too many students are still not getting access to the kinds of classes, resources and opportunities they need to be successful.” …..Read More in Huffpost Education

Educational SAT’s Tests Pass Scrutiny

Wednesday, June 29th, 2011

Wimbledon fortnight, in addition to tennis also coincides with the advent of another annual competition. It heralds the start of the schools examination silly season. Recriminations of poor performance, misguided exam and SAT’s test preparation and teaching standards abound. Critics crawl out of the woodwork to announce strident viewpoints and government educational departments  parry  inevitable negative feedback. If the results in September are good it is due to easier exams, if they are bad it’s the fault of the national curriculum, poor teaching resources schools and maybe Michale Gove.

The augment that says we could do away with them has long bounced around the playground. But startling new evidence indicates the significant value of regular testing.  Wales abandoned the equivalent of SAT’s in 2004, and later abandoned school league tables. Their ploy was to avoid the “teach to test syndrome” where the last nine weeks of the final year at primary school was devoted merely to honing the skills to pass the tests. Children didn’t learn anything new as so much depended on the results. They were a key measure  of teacher performance and indicated a schools prowess through its position in the subsequent performance league table.

The dilemma; was the time wasted by SAT’s and exams at the expense of teaching time when children could enjoy learning more or would the absence of SAT’s remove the key focus from the teaching standards. Wales has provided the answer. Since abandoning SAT’s testing the Welsh standard of education, as measured by the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA),  reveals Wales to be near the bottom of the world league tables. Alarmingly it has shown Welsh school children have also  dropped two grades in GCSE examinations.

The Welsh Education Secretary, Leighton Andrews, has bitten the bullet and announced the situation “Is evidence of a systemic failure” he says.  Needless to say he has advanced plans to reintroduce  tests supported by the subdued educationalists who originally voted the test out. This stark revelation is a double edged sword. Firstly a whole generation of Welsh children have been failed by the system. Secondly, there is still criticism of the system operating in England. We need a new approach that will provide the key performance indicators KPI  that  can used to continually  monitor a child’s performance and  can be assessed by PISA. It seems pointless to hold  end of key stage SAT’s that are too late to induce any corrective measure. The Welsh experiment has proven the consequences of abandoning tests. What is needed are far more frequent tests. The use of technology could offer huge significance in routinely testing children through educational games. Importantly the feedback would allow dynamic correction by teachers and parents and avoid the last ditch teach to test syndrome.

We certainly cannot maintain the current system in England which is clearly damaged. Being  disliked by teachers who frequently describe it  as a  waste of teaching time, our resultant performance in the world league table is a lamentable mid 20th position – well behind China in first position. But then China has historically used regular tests in the classroom for the past 1400 years.

Gove Condemns Teaching Resources and Examination Standards.

Monday, June 20th, 2011

Imagine the trauma of GCSE and A level students entering the examination room to find the question papers are incorrect, have missing data and the Educational Secretary is condemning the exams saying that they are an inadequate means to measure the teaching resources used.  Educational Secretary Michael Gove’s recent comments urged the need for UK exams to match the world’s toughest. The content and timing of these strident comments has left head teachers, parents and students reeling.  Confidence in the educational secretary and the educational system has once again been severely undermined.

For the children taking the exams having spent five years concentrating on the curriculum content, exam techniques and revision our teaching resources and pupils find the games being played by Michael Gove, who believes the exams are too easy and wildly adrift of what is required in our modern world, is a staggering blow to their confidence.  In August when the results appear we will inevitably be involved in the annual debate with exam regulators and teachers on one side versus employers and universities who claim any increase in the pass rate implies a lower standard rather than students working harder or our teaching resources being more efficient.  This criticism has faded all too quickly and the status quo remains largely unchanged.

Left unchanged The Department for education believes we will see a further decline in our world educational standards. Already we have sunk to the mid-twenties position in the world league table developed by the OECD. The view from keen2learn voiced many times in the past is that the curriculum and the exam standards should be controlled as entry levels to the next educational stage of the student. Primary school exams should be set by secondary school, GCSE’s set by industry and commerce, “A” level set by universities. This would remove the exam controversy and avoid children arriving on the doorstep of the next stage of their learning ill prepared for what is to happen next.

The recent statement by Michael Gove may appear strident and clumsy in the timing but seeks to address the misfit of our schooling with the needs of modern adult life. The fire from the hip approach will cause significant aggravation with teachers and the possibility of an overt rebuff that will allow the problem to still remain.  Michael Gove further stated “By 2015 I want us to be on an irreversible trend to get more good teachers into teaching,  more schools enjoying autonomy and all underperforming schools been taken over.  I want us to refocus our curriculum to get rid of unnecessary extras and change our discredited exam system.  It’s as much about modernisation as going back to tradition.”

The Educational Secretary has compared the output to the UK with the educational standards in Singapore, New Zealand, Canada and Hong Kong and believes that the route ahead lies in a mixture of old fashioned teaching resources and modern technology.  This is to be combined with ill performing schools being handed over to local academies that would benefit more from a concentration of educational effort than perhaps emerged with local authorities.

Clearly the viewpoint of the Educational Secretary is paramount in the future for our schools and the education standards of our teachers and ultimately our children.  The transfer to academy status may be a solution but overall it appears his strategy is being developed and released in piecemeal and in conflict with the head teachers who will be responsible to make it work. Surely the better approach would have been to take time out to develop the strategy thoroughly in association with our teaching resources and not rushed into premature statements which could imply muddled thought going off half-cocked leading to concerns, ridicule and negative reaction from teachers, parents and children.

STEM Teachers Time Need Out Of School

Friday, June 10th, 2011

As teachers become more skilled their ability to control the class, enliven the subject matter, use teaching resources to maximum advantage and complete the curriculum on schedule for the GCSE’s becomes more pronounced. But the length of service commensurate with this achievement ironically can do the teachers and their students a huge disservice. Increased length of service inevitably means they can become disconnected with the dynamics of the commercial and engineering market in which their charges will move into.

This phenomenon is especially relevant in science, engineering, technology and maths STEM disciplines. In the past children leaving secondary school tended to be employed locally. The needs of industry in the vicinity being well known by the local schools and teachers. But advances in technology, expanding world markets and a greater tendency to attend university have introduced a vastly changed employment and educational scenario. Those children aiming for a career at the leading edge of a trade or profession may not have the required depth and relevance of education to give them an ideal start. Competition from overseas students and employers adds a further dimension. Already our secondary school education is slipping in the world league tables. The preparation for university degree courses, according to university dons, is showing signs of inadequate depth and relevance.

Good exam results may be achieved, as shown by the annual analysis, but the demands of employers may come as shock when children leaving secondary school discover the mismatch of their schooling with the needs and pace of commerce and industry. Many also struggle with the arduous of their degree courses. But the possible solution, to re-program the curriculum and match the teaching skill base with the state of the art needs in employment is no easy solution and has huge repercussions. Teachers do not gain teaching skills by taking time out of school but this is perhaps exactly what they must do. The predilection to hit exam targets needs to be tempered instead with the opportunity to keep pace with the operational developments and market demands. The solution also poses an even greater problem; the resources needed in both cost and manpower.

Teachers, especially good teachers in science and maths are in short supply. The concept of releasing this limited capacity to sabbaticals spent in industry and academia would be abhorrent to most head teachers. The school would lose front line teaching resources, funds to provide supply teacher cover would be severely stretched and exam targets threatened. Yet without this move to connect with the needs of universities, commerce and industry will continue to be misaligned and at an increasing rate.

The UK is suffering a decline in engineering manufacturing and design. Overseas producers may initially rely on British skills such as in the case of the design and manufacture of Jaguar cars. But as the Indian owners home base progresses they may abruptly decide to relocate the facility to India. The recent closure of the Pifizer pharmaceutical and medical research facility in the South East indicates our science base is being reviewed by overseas owners. Without the flow of bright recruits in the UK science, technology, engineering and maths disciplines we can do little to prevent this eventuality. We need to be at the leading edge in all areas of STEM. The question now is how we can rearrange our schooling to achieve this. It will take a brave new world approach that will require a strategic review by the government and all educational parties. The current tactical maneuvers by the DFE serving only to exacerbate the problem.

Hyphens That Sting In Educational Context

Friday, June 10th, 2011

Most parents face a dilemma. School holidays and half term represent invaluable learning time to spend with their children. But a family holiday comes at an inflated cost as the travel trade see them as a captive market and the chance to raise charges considerably. Yet the educational benefit of spend some relaxing time playing games with children from early learning to year 11 say experiencing modern foreign languages in context can be enormous. We give a 20 point guideline to those delightful hyphenated  words  that arise in a child’s schooling journey. Yes we have cheated a bit!:-

1.Early-learning: A magical time when children learn a phenomenal amount in a very short time. Incredibly rewarding for parents who see their efforts turned into magic as their child absorbs information like a sponge.

2.Pre-School: Heartbreak and tribulations as the children attend their first rung in the learning journey involving a third party.

3.Key-Stages: Milestones in primary and secondary education where children learn elements set in the national curriculum. Each stage is tested to asses the performance of the child and the school. Has led to undue focus on how to pass the tests and the regrettable phenomenon of teaching to the test by some schools.

4.National-Curriculum: A serious attempt by the government’s department of education to control the learning programme. Not always deemed successful. Most head teachers could improve on the content.

5.AS-Exams: The means of measuring a child’s ability assessed against the content of the national curriculum. Now includes a psychological minefield where the children are set questions that are impossible to answer, contain mistakes or omit key information. The examinees now have to be schooled in how to remain cool and not to let these errors destroy their concentration and how to spot the errors that may appear in other questions set by the examination board by people who are specialists in the subject area?

6.High-Season: The weeks when you can take a holiday with the family and pay inflated prices. Incredibly, they directly coincide with all school holidays.

7.Peak-season: Similar to 6 above. This is for parents only. Time to dig deeper for the same holiday just enjoyed by the sliver surfer at half the price.

8.Off-peak: The time when parents can’t take holidays with their children and enjoy lower prices.

9.Low-season: Not applicable to parents. Time when the silver surfer finds the incredible deal when families are unable to travel and hotels are anxious for the custom.

10.Up-to: A misnomer when marketing people try to attract custom with non existent or frugal availability of supposedly large discounts. Should be made illegal.

11.From-savings: See up-to above. Another potentially non existent or exaggerated offer.

12.Special-Offer: That great flight offer that involves the need to fly from a distant airport at 05:00am and land at a destination airport 50 miles away from where you expected. Your return flight of course leaves your holiday location at 2:00am in the morning.

13.Half-term: The two week time slots when travel agents rub their hands with glee. The captive market of families has arrived, time to jack up the prices.

14.School-holidays: See half term and High season above, and add extra weeks into the equation.

15.School-parties: Groups of children gaining the hand-on practical side of their educational. Incredibly rewarding to children, stressful to many teachers, and attracts stares and mutterings from crabby adults who have forgotten they had kids, or never had them, and fail to recognise the vital importance these children will have on their pension.

16.School-trips: Similar to to 9 above except parents have to dig deep to find the money for the excursion. Semi enjoyable to teachers who get time away from the school. Delightful for many parents who have time off looking after their kids.

17.Teacher-holidays: The perception that teachers get at least 20 weeks paid holiday a year where they are totally free any form of school work. Most people believe they also only work between 09:00 and 15:30 each school day. Overtime is never worked.

18.School-meals: Epicurean feasts or fried stodge depending on whose viewpoint or budget you need to work to.

19.Jamie-Oliver: School meals crusader, see 18 also, who believes children need nourishment to improve their educational achievement. Has a spare key to number 10 and also markets cookery equipment from egg timers to a complete school kitchens.

20.School-run: The time when the roads are clogged with SUV trying to weave and squeeze closest to the school to drop kids off. Avoids social interaction with peers and undue exercise that would otherwise be beneficial to the children. Similar situation can be seen at kit fit gyms where members squeeze into tight or non existent parking spots closest to the gym door to save walking – then spend an hour doing extreme physical exercise.

Parent Power Boosts Pupil Performance

Wednesday, June 1st, 2011

The educational support programme for children starts with the learning games played at home with parents. But this highly productive early learning relationship should last for the whole of their educational journey not just the preschool years. Taking a practical interest by playing educational learning games at home reinforces what children have learnt at school. Although parents start the process with nursery or preschool many abandon the opportunity when the children reach primary school when ideally the link should last until they leave secondary school.

Educational learning is a two way street. Kids learn rapidly especially through the repetition involved in educational games that are seen to be fun. This provides both reassurance and allows them to demonstrate what they have learned. It is amazing what children pick up in nursery and preschool and we’re not talking about bugs! Their active minds respond positively to fun learning which entices them into learning new concepts. Yet whilst parents pro-actively join in while the kids are young we seem to let go as they get older. Ironically the hands-on parental support in primary and secondary education is equally beneficial for both parent and child. Children gain that extra support and parents can see progress being made and any stumbling blocks dynamically. We don’t need the “tiger” approach where parent involvement becomes overbearing but the proven benefits of their routine involvement is well documented and has been urged for many years by the department of education.

A tremendous level of learning can be achieved in maths, science and ICT through the educational games used in school and repeated at home. The interaction at home is a huge positive and incredibly rewarding. Studies reveal the positive involvement of parents is beneficial irrespective of economic, social, racial or cultural background. The longer the parent is involved the more impressive are the child’s results.

There is also a key factor where studies reveal that social, economic, intellectual achievement and family bonds are strengthened by eating meals together at home. Discussions round the family table help children to open up and discuss key issues that can ultimately help them improve not only in peer relationships and class activities but can also help in exams and tests. To help the conversations to flow around the meal table, often not any easy task with teenagers, there are educational games like Fink Cards and Discussion cards that have been designed to inspire conversation during meals for all ages. Getting children to express what they have learnt in class can help with their powers of expression, literacy and improve knowledge of the subject. Their parents can learn to enjoy the experience and contribute to the discussion giving guidance from a mature viewpoint.

The opportunity for children to learn and parents simultaneously to understand the on-going development of their children is an invaluable asset to both parties. Around 75 per cent of learning retention is achieved through practice. Although children are taught in school for around 196 days a year the opportunity to practice what they are learning in the busy classroom is quite limited. Just think what could be achieved through using some of the remaining 169 days a year they are away from school.

(more…)

School Children Should Be Taught To Tweet In Literacy Lessons.

Thursday, May 26th, 2011

The national curriculum must keep pace with the dynamics of the comunications market. Children need teaching the benefits and consequences in the use of social media  and how it can play a significant role in modern communications.

There are significant benefits in the use of social media but there is also a dark side. As newer forms of media emerge children should be taught  the skills in their effective use and the legal ethics of using social networks such as Facebook and Twitter. Recent events involving court injunctions have highlighted the potential legal pitfalls. Our teaching resources, already hard pressed to maintain the curriculum, have  to present the legal implications of  irregular use of this growing medium.

Apart from the abhorrent use associated with cyber bullying the positive flow of news, gossip and opinion is a growing phenomenon.  Already schools, colleges and universities, reacting to the demand for greater ease of access to support academic activities, are reviewing Wifi connections to cover the entire campus.  The integral internet connection freedom will allow  its use in a private capacity to students and staff.  The dilemma facing the academic management is the control between academic  and private use along with the subsequent cost increase in bandwidth.

In addition to  the cost of providing the service there could be the legal complications if the service is abused.  At the moment the social networks attempt to fend off misuse as being attributed to the user. Understandably the complexity to control transmission would be a significant drain on their operations and the impact of further legislation on the use of the service has yet to be established.

But we also have seen an interesting development in the misuse of the social media.  During the recent round of court injunctions a dam burst occurred within Twitter.  The information restricted by the courts was freely revealed by thousands of users possibly fuelled by the inherent clamour to gossip on line and a belief that the sheer weight of Tweet’s would overwhelm effective prosecution.  The subsequent revelation in parliament by an MP citing prior exposure on Twitter is a further conundrum.  Was parliamentary privilege misused by the MP? Making the declaration in the sanctuary of parliament that is subsequently routinely broadcast destroys the element of confidentiality.

A key element of education is to prepare children for adulthood.  The range of media now available to instantly broadcast opinions by anybody hooked up to the internet is now legion. Historically to publish a  viewpoint involved having an article or letter published in a magazine or newspaper.  Critically this route involved the backstop of a newspaper editor who would scrutinise the content.  Now anybody can say anything, anywhere and therein lays the danger.

An inadvertent comment, maybe made in the heat of the moment or based on frugal evidence, can now become global in a matter of hours.  The immaturity of a child or young adult could lead to unintended consequences – or perhaps fuel the malicious aspirations of an undesirable member of society. Yet there are huge benefits from this freedom of speech that await children. Being able reach a massive audience needs treating with care; it is difficult to delete content once published. New skills are required especially in the role of expression and brevity. The skill of  literacy précis in blogs and micro blogs has reached a new level with the need to express an opinion on Twitter in 140 characters. Teaching children such skills will pay dividends in the world of communication. And if we can also train politicians in the art we could see a far more productive government!

Why Educate Kids When Computers Will Do Everything for Them

Monday, May 23rd, 2011

Why do children still need to endure the learning process in school when so much in adult life is automated?  Maths is handled by calculators and computers; spelling benefits from spell check and predictive text; general knowledge is freely supported by Wikipedia and Google et al. search engines.  Is there a need therefore to bother learning anything in school apart from the best facility to play educational games and access the internet.

Is this is the end of the real world as we know it? Is the learning process in schools, designed to provide children with the academic skills needed in adult life, under attack? How can we match the needs of the status quo with the rapid developments in technology, both real and perceived, that could make some of the content of the curriculum outmoded by the time the children finish school?

The future world for children could be completely different from the situation as we know it. Technology is moving at a phenomenal pace. Many of the facilities now taken for granted have only been around for the past five years.  And who would have thought a Laptop and PC could start to become displaced by tablet computer or notebook. Recent trading statistics show a substantial decline in laptops purchases in favour of the iPad and notebooks. Google at 10 years old may soon have to defend itself from a superior facility that has not been invented yet but could emerge at extraordinary speed when it does.  The application of technology in the next few years could be surreal compared to what we know now. All this has been occurring during the 15 year educational schooling journey of a child.

But could these advances really undermine the content teachers are projecting in the classroom.  The maths, science and ICT games used as teaching resources could be outmoded before the children leave school.  I recall seeing a BT exhibition around eight years ago that focused on technology on the home and the use of the Internet. BT demonstrated a number of possible innovations but the one that intrigued me was a fridge that scanned the bar code as you move products in and out of the fridge. Coupled with a load cell on which the product was placed in the fridge the computer analysed the consumption rate and remaining weight to predict a reorder point.  No need to place an order though, it was done automatically as the fridge was already on line to Tesco!  Farfetched – except the iPhone can now scan barcodes and add items to the weekly shopping list.  With delivery the next day and payment taken by direct debit who needs to understand the maths or calculate the payment process.

There is a flaw though. Apart from the possibility of being a castaway on Desert Island, or living through a massive power failure, when most technology becomes useless, we need people capable of using their science, engineering, technology and maths (STEM) brains to develop the next generation of technology. We therefore need a highly relevant and dynamic curriculum that reflects the fast pace of change. We need to sustain the classes’ attention and fire their enthusiasm as to what is to come and how they can be part of it. But we also need to prepare children to manage if they “crash landed” on a remote desert island, with no phone or computer where their education has prepared them to analyse, plan and survive.

University Students Critical Of Their Secondary Education.

Tuesday, May 17th, 2011

A survey by the University of Cambridge international examinations has revealed that a very high percentage of students are highly critical of the standard of education they received in secondary school.  Although they may have achieved the correct “A” level grade the depth of learning is inadequate to support  them fully for the step up to degree level education.

A total of 94% of students said that their secondary education could have been better matched to the needs of university study.  A significant clear gap emerged in their ability to conduct independent research and their report writing skills were not matched to the requirement demanded in university. This  implies  our teaching resources are concentrating more on achieving targets measured by the number of “A” levels gained and failing to give students the depth of learning that best prepares them for the next stage in their educational journey.

The concern is not new.  There have been many criticisms levelled by captains of industry that many children finishing secondary school are ill prepared for the employment market.  They complain they inherit the burden of completing the education of new recruits to the standard  required in industry.  The same issue cascades through the schooling process. Secondary school head teachers are predominately critical of the standard of children leaving primary school that subsequently places an often insurmountable liability on the secondary school  to support the pupil properly.

It must surely lie with the next level in the educational journey to influence the quality of candidates which they are accepting. Ideally secondary head teachers should have responsibility for setting the curriculum and tests taken by primary school pupils to ensure they have the right qualities and educational grounding needed to support them during throughout secondary education.  Similarly industry must take a more positive role in setting the standards they require from secondary school leavers. This has to involve a form of steaming that will predict the likely choice of a student at 15 years old.  Lastly, universities must be responsible for setting the curriculum and standards of exam that prepares students adequately to fulfil the studies required at degree level.

But we are no alone.  A report by the U.S. Department of Defense estimates up to 75 per cent of service applicants are currently unsuitable to join the military due to poor educational achievement. Clearly the future national defence of the USA is causing cause for concern. The report also states one in six young adults in Nebraska (for example) does not graduate from high school on time. Of those seeking to enlist 15 per cent are rejected due to low scores for maths, literacy and problem solving.

Could a fundamental change in educational strategy stand a chance in the current thinking of government circles?  It would remove undue emphasis on passing exams to hit targets and place greater weight on the needs of the subsequent stage in the educational journey. Perhaps more importantly it would involve teachers in the fundamental selection and complexity of the curriculum. It could then remove the pointless exercise of feeding secondary schools with children ill equipped during primary school who subsequently fail to thrive during secondary school.  The current system may appear to tick all the right boxes in exam results key performance indicators but finds little support in commerce, further education and ultimately employers.

Schools Freed From Educational Authority Could Flounder

Saturday, May 14th, 2011

The economic situation is affecting the vast majority of commercial and public sector operations.  Inevitable budget reviews by educational authorities have reassessed the funding and staffing levels associated with the teaching resources in our schools. Some new schools have the opportunity of self-control but whilst removing the essence of local education authorities allowing many schools to be in control of their own destiny may seem a positive move there is some concern as to how they will cope unaided in the wide world.

In the commercial world there are classic cases where a small company being part of a large group had failed to thrive in performance and profitability. The same company having been shed by the corporate group becomes in charge of its own destiny springs to the surface like a cork and suddenly enjoys resurgence with both enthusiasm and increased profitability.  Can the same effect be found be enjoyed by these new schools?  Certainly the sometimes arduous bureaucracy and target achievements demanded considerable focus from the head teacher, distracting them from taking a more parochial view of the needs of the school.  The stories of stress and frustration are legion and the feeling of being remote to the needs of the school perhaps had a significant influence in the schools performance.

The many schools that now face the opportunity of reduced pressure and cost by their removal from local education authority control also face a mixture of opportunity and increased pressure to perform in their own right.  But as schools gain greater independence there will also be a huge demand placed on school governors.  These predominantly untrained individuals now face a whole new world of independence where their skill will be tested in the performance of the school.

Many of our schools could now enter a very confused period.  After years of tight restrictive operational control they have the ropes removed.  But the big question is whether the schools will cope? Have the years of bureaucracy prevented the nurture of skills required to manage themselves effectively?  Ofsted the government schools inspection body has raised concerns about the quality of governance in schools and state that it is a common factor in schools that are under special measures.

Geraldine Hutchinson, assistant director of the Educational trust CfBT raises her concern. “Schools with governing bodies that are not up to the task can face serious consequences. Those schools that lack strong governance are at a significant disadvantage in terms of attainment and school improvement ”adding  “This is particularly the case in primary schools which are a lot less robust than secondary schools I their ability to cope with change.”

The emergence of the academy and free school will place a demand for exceptional head teachers backed by effective school governors.  Whereas it  would be possible to recruit a head teacher from other parts of the country, although statistics indicate this is no easy task, the school will be a reliant upon local school governors.  If this support is not available it bodes ill for the fortunes of that particular school.  An area of encouragement is the number of people volunteering to become school governors has increased over the last few years.  Although this may indicate a keen reserve of commitment they inevitably enter the role with little or no training.  This places an awkward burden on the head teacher at the very point when they need an effective senior management team. Instead the head could be side-tracked into having to provide the on-site training for them.

The transition from the structure criticised over the years by teaching resources will be a travesty if another generation of children in our schools are hampered by ineffective control as they move into the new era.    Maybe a better plan is the formal training and certification of school governors before the policy was introduced.

STEM Education Must Start In Primary School

Friday, May 13th, 2011

STEM, the science, technology, engineering, and maths initiative which is becoming widespread in secondary school seems to have missed the point in many primary schools. In general the commitment of much of the teaching resources in primary school is geared towards hitting targets set in the national curriculum. Yet STEM opportunities could materially benefit the student and the community as a career option.

A similar situation is occurring in the USA. New teachers there can typically obtain a license to teach elementary school without taking a what could eventually be a college level STEM class without demonstrating a solid grasp of mathematics or scientific knowledge. Primary school is the ideal time to nurture the inquisitive mind of children towards the scope of scientific inquiry. The opportunity appears missed that would ensure students enjoy successful early experiences in maths,engineering and science that would generate the curiosity and confidence in these topics to encourage students need to pursue careers in STEM subject fields.

The publication by the National Council exploring Teacher Quality entitled “No Common Denominator: The Preparation of Elementary Teachers in Mathematics by America’s Education Schools”, highlighted the need for more rigorous preparation in mathematics in elementary level trainee teacher. But in the two years since its release very little has changed. Not surprisingly the evidence has shown that elementary school students have higher achievement in mathematics when taught by teachers who are good at teaching maths. This may be an obvious outcome to the outsider but it is amazing how often unprepared teachers are requested to take a maths class.

Diana Epstein and Raegen Miller publication “Slow Off the Mark,”focuses on the selection and preparation of elementary school teachers. Most will be required to teach mathematics and science when they enter the classroom. It is primary school mathematics and science that lay the foundation for future STEM learning and exploitation. Yet all too often it is these same teachers who subsequently fail to inspire children or fire up their enthusiasm to pursue Science and maths based degrees or careers.

As the manufacturing base in the UK and USA moves inexorably to the Far East we will need children to explore and innovate to support the economy. Without the grounding in Stem subjects this may prove more difficult to achieve. The embryonic approach to science and engineering, which can be instilled in the young mind, can last a lifetime. The innovative entrepreneur of tomorrow can be fired up in primary school. Maybe we need to displace the desire to become a rock star, astronaut, prime minister or president with the practical skill that can invent the next vacuum cleaner, social website operation or Stephen Hawkin. But for this to happen we need top move away from the short term target driven approach and take a long term view of where we need to support the economy in the face of overseas competition. It could prove to be our salvation as the world regroups after centuries of western domination.

Is UK Educational System Failing Similar To USA

Wednesday, May 11th, 2011

It seems  concerns over  the advance of educational learning and schooling performance is a preoccupation with many English speaking countries. The disquiet linked to the many trials and tribulations within the teaching resources in the UK is echoed  in the USA and Australia. But whilst we are deliberating on the cause and treatment the learning process and schooling in the Far East is gaining strength.

A significant argument is building; whether the hiatus has been created by social changes, educational policy, the rigid application of the curriculum or probable interference with our teaching resources. An article that describes  the current scene  in New York is worth a read, the similarities are stark, but maybe you need to get a stiff drink ready to support you. The failure of American Schools


English Higher On Educational Agenda Overseas than In UK.

Monday, May 9th, 2011

Overseas teaching resources regard learning English as a critical mission to higher extent than we do in the UK.  Historically the UK has a poor record in learning modern foreign languages yet we are now becoming beaten to the post by many overseas countries with regards our ability to learn English. It seems we in England have a lot to learn.  Our mother tongue is being learnt in a highly effective manner overseas and our continuing failure in schools could make us economically vulnerable in the future.

The International Proficiency Index (EPI) measures countries proficiency in English and to produce an index of a country’s ability in the English language.  The analysis, conducted by the English Educational Institute Education First Programme (EF) considers cultural, social, financial and historical background to formulate the results.

EPI – EF Country Rankings in non-English countries learning English.

Position            Country                           Index                    Rating

1                              Norway                                69.09                    Very High Proficiency

2                              Netherlands                       67.93                     Very High Proficiency

3                              Denmark                             66.58                     Very High Proficiency

4                              Sweden                                66.26                     Very High Proficiency

5                              Finland                                  61.25                     Very High Proficiency

6                              Austria                                  58.58                     High Proficiency

7                              Belgium                                57.23                     High Proficiency

8                              Germany                              56.64                     High Proficiency

9                              Malaysia                               55.54                     High Proficiency

10                            Poland                                  54.62                     Moderate Proficiency

Although there is a geographic link with Europe, interestingly, proficiency in English is growing notably in the more wealthy Asian countries.  The Far East is catching up in proficiency in English a notable example is with Korea which is now lies in 13th place.  The Korean focus has produced improvements each year since 1988 the year when Seoul hosted the Olympic Games at which Korea adopted English as the official language.  Up to that point Korea reviewed English as an academic subject.  Since 1988 Koreans see the benefits of international communications in English much supported by their major trading relationship with the USA.  Although English taught at school has improved the index position  from the EF shows that English is being increasingly used by adults.

Position            Country                   Index                    Rating

11                           Switzerland                 54.60                     Moderate Proficiency

12                           Hong Kong                   54.44                     Moderate Proficiency

13                           South Korea                54.19                     Moderate Proficiency

14                           Japan                            54.17                     Moderate Proficiency

15                           Portugal                        53.62                     Moderate Proficiency

16                           Argentina                     53.49                     Moderate Proficiency

17                           France                          53.16                     Moderate Proficiency

18                           Mexico                          51.48                     Moderate Proficiency

19                           Czech Republic          51.31                     Moderate Proficiency

20                           Hungary                       50.80                     Moderate Proficiency

There are interesting influences amongst the students of English.  The EF has reviewed the gap between students who do not travel abroad and those that do.  Another consideration is governmental concerns that learning English as a foreign language will reduce their national identity a factor which has emerged in say France’s position, well down on other European countries and 17th in the index.

The economic implications of communicating in English are clear.  Fuelled by trade with the USA, the internet and social network sites, learning English leads to greater commercial opportunities which accumulate wealth.  A case in hand is Sweden who ranks fourth in the index. Their position is partially due to the number of global companies based in Sweden and partly because English was introduced as one of the most important subjects in the Swedish school curriculum. It is vitally important our educational policies in the UK that improve learning English are strengthened if we are to provide our future generations with a sporting chance to excel in the world economy.

Educational Initiatives To Develop Star Teachers

Thursday, April 28th, 2011

The recent “Dream School” TV series, using TV celebrities as teachers, proved exceptional teaching resources are hard to find. These guest presenters were incredibly knowledgeable in their subject area but were not necessarily the best teachers. The key outcome of the programme series highlighted just how much a good teacher can hold children’s interest.

The law of averages indicates that there will be some good, bad and indifferent teachers within our schools in the UK. Of the total of around 450,000 teachers we could reasonably assume there will be five per cent with exceptional ability. That equates to 22,500 great teachers. At the same time the General Teaching Council admits there are 17,000 failing teachers with the lamentable fact that just 18 teachers have been dismissed for incompetence in the last 10 years. A regrettable consequence of failing to deal effectively with this situation is just how many children have been taught by a failing teacher. Assuming such teachers are involved in taking three classes of 35 children, there is a probability that 1,875,000 children are currently being taught by failing teachers.

The recruitment and development of the star teacher potential could present an extraordinary positive opportunity. Their limited number means they are currently spread thinly across our 30,000 schools. The Dream Schools TV programme proved that great teachers are not necessarily the most qualified. Realistically they will continue to be hard to find and we therefore need a scheme that would increase their talents to as many children as possible but we would need to overcome some of the current constraints in conventional teaching. Apart from paying an attractive salary we need to increase the class size above 30 that they could handle. The larger classes would need to assemble in a suitable auditorium and use Broadcast technology to project the reception of their lessons and allow them to present to 200 to 300 children. Additional teachers could support the exercise and there could be a possibility to broadcast the session to other school groups in remote areas, covering the gap left by Teachers TV which has just closed.

The super class could be used in the major subjects such as English, Maths and Science. Saving on teachers payroll and the teaching resources needed in the class. The concept is not new, there are a number of examples where papers have recorded the ideals and pitfalls of teaching large maths classes http://www.lon-capa.org/papers/JungicKentMetz.pdf. And large English classes http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/think/articles/teaching-large-classes . Even so the opportunity to improve the performance of children and schools is enormous.

Teachers Social Standing Must Be Improved To Boost Education

Monday, April 25th, 2011

Whilst teachers in the Far East are revered by students and society the  tendency in the UK and Australia, it seems,  believe teachers have  a cushy job, endless holidays and should take over the role of parent. Is this the reason behind declining discipline standards in schools that is diluting out teaching resources robbing many children of a significant portion of their education.

The perception of a teachers lot clearly is a little misplaced. The level of stress in our teaching resources is legion brought on predominately by the challenges of society that can often view their position as child minders. And a government that believes teachers should be told what to do and how to do it. It is no wonder many of our best potential teachers have avoided the job.  But any attempt to reposition teachers in society will take generations to achieve.

There is an underlying level of disruption in many schools that can  be tracked back to failures in parental control and peer influence. This deep seated problem is not easy fixed but until it is the fundamental role of teacher as a font of knowledge and wisdom to be passed on to children will remain impaired. Instead their expertise is diluted by the need to effect  social correction, essentially caring out the parenting role abandoned at home. But it is not just teachers that feel this effect. Police, ambulance and fire services have all suffered from disruption and abuse from children.

The re-establishment of the recognition of public services is not going to change overnight. Until it is we will continue to see a dilution in the support services. This catch 22 situation will require an essential change in government policy that would have far reaching strategic importance. Our educational programme must compete with the changes in world order, especially in the Far East. Perhaps the greatest challenge  is the control of educational policy that lies in the hands of the Education Secretary, and the majority of educational ministers are in the job for a mere 18 months

We are not alone in the situation. The Australian government see common issues in the situation with the standing of teachers the UK.  Could the resolution  to correct the trend emerge with  international cooperation.? A difficult task. A number of previous national remits have failed. The drugs and litter Czars appointed for their public standing and experience abandoned their respective tasks after a very short tenure citing the role as impossible.

If the government recognise  there has been a change in the society the huge challenge is how to correct it. As a democracy there are limitations as to what and how changes can be introduced. But to do nothing will result in a significant proportion of children will continue to be robbed of a portion of their education that could prove vital in the years to come.

Teach To Test Syndrome Emerges In Australia

Friday, April 22nd, 2011

Concerns from the teaching resources in Australia echo those of the UK. In order to boost exam results in literacy and numeracy teachers are being financially coerced into the teaching to the test practice seen in the UK at the expense of developing further learning.

Julia Gillard, the “Et tu Brutus” prime minister of Australia* was two years ago the educational minister when she recommended time limits to preparing children for exams.  Yet as children across Australia sit the NAPLAN tests next month it appears that progress in limiting the teach to test preparation has been largely ignored.

Every child is different and needs the scope to rehearse for the exams claim many states and territories in Australia uncomfortable with a set limit.  But behind the scenes there is an huge incentive to ignore Ms Gillard’s doctrine. Schools in Australia receive reward payments for improved literacy and numeracy performance. The federal government educational department understandably do not want their time limit programme to be manipulated, but who can blame the teachers.

In comparison it is claimed teachers in the UK spend around 10 per cent of the total annual teaching programme in developing exam expertise. It is a concern that although exam results may be improved additional and new learning time that teachers and children would find rewarding is lost as a consequence. The problem is international and appears a retrograde step towards developing the scope of modern education. With the growth in technology there must be a better way of assessing a child’s performance.

*We refer to the recent activity where Ms Gillard instigated a coup that abruptly removed her boss the previous prime minister Kevin Rudd from office.

UK Teaching Resources Slip In International League Tables.

Thursday, April 21st, 2011

The opportunity for teachers to inspire the learning process in children can last them a lifetime, and in turn, influence the commercial direction of the UK. But at the moment teachers are hounded towards test results that are reducing the learning content for children and causing concern amongst teachers. A solution could be found in fulfilling the growing need to grant teachers a realistic level of recognition of their standing in society, salary and performance parameters needed to attract the very best teachers.

The influence of a teachers work in the classroom has strategic consequences for generations of schoolchildren as subsequent fledged adults. But if we want the best teachers to support this strategic objective we cannot afford to pay peanuts.

Anyone compiling a job evaluation analysis of the teaching resources needed in our schools would reveal a conundrum. Although we could argue teachers are paid a reasonable salary they are certainly not paid the King’s ransom enjoyed by the likes of investment bankers and hedge fund managers.  Yet both professions are taking equal risks with the national economy. Teachers are in part responsible for initiating the skill base in children necessary to ultimately build and support the national economy.

For many years there has been a downbeat impression of our teaching standards. The national curriculum aimed at injecting renewed pace and structural learning has fallen well short of the intentions. Overall standards are down; teachers are blamed, tens of thousands of children fail at primary school to be processed regardless into secondary school where they doomed to understandably fail to thrive. These same children probably go on to drag down the performance of the classes they attend whilst they divert the teacher, who unable to spend the extraordinary time to address any deficiency, leaves the child to do the best they can. No sensible commercial operation would release sub-standard components to pass onto the next stage in production with the obvious outcome of substandard finished products. Built in faults rarely have the capacity to correct themselves.

And so we see an alarming percentage of children complete secondary education with insufficient credentials to enter meaningful employment. But can we really blame teachers? Their job is perhaps one of the few that can constructively make or break the enthusiasm in the children they teach. The constant pressure to hit targets convinces a staggering number of new teachers to leave the profession within a few years. The chance of children being groomed by good experienced teachers is perhaps lost forever. Most of those who remain accept the stuffing has been knocked out of the job. They knuckle down to hit targets, adopt the latest in a long line of initiatives and generally spend most of their time fighting the system.

And in the meantime we slip further down the international league table for the quality of our education.  We lie in around 25th position , way behind  many far eastern countries who have moved to dominate the schooling standards in line with the demands emerging with the commercial polarisation to the east.  Our role in the world order is destined to change over the next few years. We need our children’s education to match the flexibility that will be demanded of them in the modern job market. And we desperately need great teachers with the social standing and ability to achieve this objective. Such a strategy must have full government support that can really only be addressed by an Education Secretary that can remain in the post for five years, and a prime minister that addresses the long term needs  of education  rather than overseas invasions.

Fun Learning Holds Greater Educational Benefit Over Text Book Slog.

Wednesday, March 23rd, 2011

Fun Learning Holds Greater Educational Benefit Than A Text Book Slog. The fast changing world of communications technology needs to be harnessed by educational authorities. Capturing some of children’s free time to play educational games can pay dividends in learning progress.

Playing any game starts with understanding the rules. Progress inevitably is slow at the start and builds as the game progresses and the players become more proficient. Repetition enhances the skill and practice hones the ability. This rule of learning can be applied to virtually any game from sports to chess, but applying it in educational games that practices the classroom lesson hold the greatest potential.

As adults we can perhaps all remember elements of the boring bits about school and many classroom lessons. Maybe it was the teacher or the teaching resources being used that created the grind. If like me, you had a wayward imagination you could be miles away in some adventure flying a helicopter or fast jet rather than worrying what this science and maths thing was all about. And the real cruncher; you would be set homework based on the lesson, only partially understood, to improve your comprehension through some practice at home. Fat chance you would cope especially as the mission in the helicopter remained unfinished.

Despite my improving “flying skills” the reality of failing to understand quadratic equations and their relevancy in your world did not help progress in the classroom. Worse still, as I later discovered, the vast majority of parents were like mine; busy, reluctant to lend too much of a hand as they were taught maths in a different way at school themselves and didn’t want to confuse your work. The reality perhaps, they didn’t want to show themselves up to the teacher and face parents night especially when the teacher was that attractive Miss Lloyd. No, best you sweat through the maths homework on your own. Damn, wouldn’t it be good if someone could invent a mobile phone so you could ring your friend for help!

In my day educational games were as rare as hen’s teeth. The ability to hold the class’s attention relied solely on teacher ability. Some were good, some not so. The population growth over the years has increased the demand for teachers. But as the population grew so the need to regiment their learning activities to ensure continuity and equality of learning content become more apparent. The birth of the national curriculum introduced a common standard in learning whilst simultaneously destroying the freedom of the creative teacher to teach outside the box.

Many experienced teachers left the profession for this reason and we entered an era of central educational experimentation, change, initiatives, dabbling and, not surprisingly, declining standards. To correct this regrettable trend we need more educational games and fun learning to engage children. Not that all classroom learning can or should be fun, but to capitalise on the technology and communication devices that have emerged schooling needs to move beyond the school gate and compete for the free time that is fast becoming occupied by Wii, Playstation and iPhone apps. The national curriculum needs a complete facelift else we in the UK may get left behind in the world stakes. Over the past few decades we have slipped to now lie in the mid 20th position in the OECD ranking of educational standards. The system is broke and it therefore definitely needs fixing

Quick Search

Advanced search help

Our twitter account.

Email Signup

for News and Product Updates

SSL
We're listed on ShopSafe Verified by visa