Teachers, fed up with wasting teaching resources and valuable learning time to the national assessment tests have revolted by refusing to prepare kids specifically for the tests.
Interestingly this reaction from teachers is not in the UK but Australia. The National Assessment in literacy and numeracy programme (NAPLAN) is under threat from schools abject criticism of the precise intention of the scheme. The UK teacher unions have similarly managed to drag government educational departments to task, convincing them to scrap the equivalent UK Statutory Assessment Tests (SAT’s). The overwhelming opinion of Australian teachers believe the tests are no more than the government playing games with the educational programme and more designed to measure the teachers and school performance against targets. As a consequence the emphasis on passing the tests has been at the expense of new learning. Schools are regularly abandoning lessons expansion instead concentrating on drilling children to pass the tests. The “teach to test” process that can absorb nine precious weeks a year grooms children to answer questions parrot fashion rather than use reasoning.
Presumably children will be able to use their maths skill to calculate that 23 per cent of their schooling days will be used merely to provide a measure of the schools performance. But the real question to be answered is what further educational achievement could have been achieved had this time been used to further the learning programme of children.
The stance by Australian teachers has, however, angered many parents who are supporting the national assessment programme in literacy and numeracy tests for years 3, 5, 7 and 9. They see schools in the private sector and independent sector who maintain the tests will have an advantage. New South Wales teachers federation president Bob Lipscombe said his members would no undertake preparation for the tests because it would dominate a school’s work.
Lower performing schools could possibly allocate even more time to teach to test to improve their school results. Bob Lipscomb said “We support national testing but this assessment has become more about the school than the students.”
He rejected concerns from parents that blocking the national tests would disadvantage children. Australian Deputy Prime Minister Julia Gillard was adamant the tests would go ahead in May advising she has 3,000 trained and experienced examination supervisors ready to step in if the teachers refused to distribute the exams. An interesting concept and if nothing else children will learn about trade union activities. But this move begs the question where these trained supervisors will come from. If they are ready and waiting in the wings would they be better employed as active teachers to help reduce the teacher pupil ratio?
If children are to be at a disadvantage with independent schools is this based on exam results or breath of education? The child educated for an extra 45 weeks in their schooling journey instead of taking SAT’s and NAPLAN tests is surely the better option for the child in the long term.




