Archive for April, 2010

Government Faces Literacy And Numeracy Revolt From Teachers.

Sunday, April 25th, 2010

Teachers, fed up with wasting teaching resources and valuable learning time to the national assessment tests have revolted by refusing to prepare kids specifically for the tests.

Interestingly this reaction from teachers is not in the UK but Australia.  The National Assessment in literacy and numeracy programme (NAPLAN) is under threat from schools abject criticism of the precise intention of the scheme. The UK teacher unions have similarly managed to drag government educational departments to task, convincing them to scrap the equivalent UK Statutory Assessment Tests (SAT’s). The overwhelming opinion of Australian teachers believe the tests are no more than the  government playing games with the educational programme and more designed to measure the teachers and school performance against targets. As a consequence the emphasis on passing the tests has been at the expense of new learning. Schools are regularly abandoning lessons expansion instead concentrating on drilling children to pass the tests. The “teach to test” process that can absorb nine precious weeks a year grooms children to answer questions parrot fashion rather than use reasoning.

Presumably children will be able to use their maths skill to calculate that 23 per cent of their schooling days will be used merely to provide a measure of the schools performance. But the real question to be answered is what further educational achievement could have been achieved had this time been used to further the learning programme of children.

The stance by Australian teachers has, however, angered many parents who are supporting the national assessment programme in literacy and numeracy tests for years 3, 5, 7 and 9. They see schools in the private sector and independent sector who maintain the tests will have an advantage.  New South Wales  teachers  federation president Bob Lipscombe said his members would no undertake preparation for the tests because it would dominate a school’s work.

Lower performing schools could possibly allocate even more time to teach to test to improve their school results.  Bob Lipscomb said “We support national testing but this assessment has become more about the school than the students.”

He rejected concerns from parents that blocking the national tests would disadvantage children.  Australian Deputy Prime Minister Julia Gillard was adamant the tests would go ahead in May advising she has 3,000 trained and experienced examination supervisors ready to step in if the teachers refused to distribute the exams.  An interesting concept and if nothing else children will learn about trade union activities. But this move begs the question where these trained supervisors will come from. If they are ready and waiting in the wings would they be better employed as active teachers to help reduce the teacher pupil ratio?

If children are to be at a disadvantage with independent schools is this based on exam results or breath of education?  The child educated for an extra 45 weeks in their schooling journey instead of taking SAT’s and NAPLAN tests is surely the better option for the child in the long term.

Inspirational Maths Teachers Are Like Gold Dust – Highly Valuable and Extraordinary Hard To Find

Wednesday, April 14th, 2010

Maths and numeracy are critical in a child’s educational programme. But inspirational maths teaching stems from very limited resources; even the best can be promoted and lost to front line teaching.

I was OK in maths in Saint Anne’s primary school in Wandsworth.  Fond memories of this delightful old Victorian school where for a 100 per cent attendance I was once given an extra 20 minutes play time after a lunch break.  Unfortunately I was the only soul to gain such an accolade on this occasion and those 20 minutes on my own in a deserted playground turned the reward into a misplaced penalty.  Solitary playtime is the epitome of Billy no mates but maybe helped me to enjoy my own company.  Needless to say my reward was seen by my peers as a deterrent. The rules rapidly changed in case it spurred a spate of deliberate absenteeism to avoid my fate.  And then of course I’d missed 20 minutes of the lesson, a true juxtaposition of the award itself. But I enjoyed numeracy and looked forward to the lessons. It would have been even greater fun to have played the many maths games now available at home.

My maths skill then took a hammering. The move up to secondary school saw me one of 1800 children at the brand spanking new Holland Park comprehensive (1958)  This was a culture shock par excellence.  The size of a small town there were four teaching blocks, each three storeys high.  Stair cases were colour coded to aid navigation.  A massive central resources building comprised of an assembly hall to house the whole school with even a dress circle for the sixth form, canteen facilities, four gymnasiums, a swimming pool and a technical block were I learnt to cook as the metal work classes were full.  It had two enormous playgrounds.  The only missing ingredient were playing fields.  These were five miles away at Barn Elms on the banks of the Thames, a great 30 minutes coach trip each way especially welcome when it ate into the available time for wretched cross country runs.

Holland Park was a streamed comprehensive, something that is there is re-emerging after years of ailing alternatives.  This meant classes comprised of children of similar ability. Simple to understand and effective. Children of lower academic ability could still aspire to be top of their class. It also meant that teachers could be a groomed with the skills to match class needs and expectations.  Disruptive children in any stream would move into centralised classes manned by teachers trained in the specific needs of the unruly. But my maths ability gained in primary school fell through the floor.

Partly traumatised by the massive increase in school size between primary and secondary school my maths ability had been savaged by a further aspect.  The sheer numbers of teachers led to frequent staff changes.  Trainees will come and inevitably go unable to adapt to the environment. Lessons progressed in truncated form as the stream of teachers familiarise themselves with the state of play.  Each term will see a legion of new teaching resources including, bizarrely, a replacement for the music musical teacher who had killed himself playing Russian roulette!

Two years later and I experienced a move to another groundbreaking school, Wolverstone Hall near Ipswich.  This boarding school operated by the then London County Council was an amalgam of schooling and social experiment. The manifest comprised of children from diverse social and academic backgrounds, and in this context it worked well. We would rub shoulders with no knowledge or concern of heritage.  But my maths education and general academic ability continued to flounder. Learning and I were not easy bedfellows. I eventually left Wolverstone Hall with a smattering of “O” levels, inversely proportional to the effort applied.  I left, transferring to the Gateway school in Leicester, to have another crack.  And there something odd happened.

The Headteacher Dr Fraser, a stern and much esteemed figure, commanded instant respect. Not only did he teach, but held a routine appraisal with each boy in the school.  Over the years he had honed the procedure such that in 15 minutes he could discover strengths, weaknesses and develop a personal action plan that proved incredibly forthright.  His teaching team were highly motivated and responded positively to the diagnosis of the sage.

And my performance in maths recovered.  Fuelled by a teacher who had the knack of putting maths across in an intriguing way my performance improved immeasurably and finally proven in the results.  The result of an enthusiastic teaching team led by an experienced teaching headmaster.  How things have changed.  The head teacher is now predominately a mix of administration and targets.  Their experienced teaching skill sadly missed in the trenches.  If only we could outsource the school administration, avoid the focus on targets and get Headteachers to use their teaching skill, maybe, just maybe we would see an improvement in numeracy and a love of maths.

How to Learn To Fail With Educational Games

Tuesday, April 6th, 2010

One of the critical facets of learning is achieved through failure. Playing educational games allows us to learn from our mistakes with an element of fun. We gain greater depth of knowledge by learning to understand the rules and where we went wrong, the effect of the failure, and vitally important, how to correct the fault.

A vital element in the training an aircraft pilot is what to do when the engines fail, a component fails, what happens if they climb too steeply or bank too severely. None of this occurs every day and its rather comforting to know they know what not to do as much as what they should do to let us enjoy a smooth flight. Awareness of the consequences is a vital element of learning.

We live in a world where building up self esteem in children is very important and so making mistakes can be seen as damaging. Exposure to failure and learning to correct the fault is unfortunately often excluded in the learning programme for children. Parents and teachers can sometimes believe that a child should not be exposed to failure which could reveal a flaw in the teaching standards or ability of the child. Targets and emotions conspire to seek success and the essential character building and learning experience from failing is lost. A secret poll of parents would reveal that if they had access to just one piece of information on their child it would be where they stood in the class rank.  This presents an illusion of learning that can lead to problems later in employment for the child.

Heath and safety, fear of litigation and the banks will present enough barriers to a successful career as it is. But it is predominately the people that are prepared to take calculated risks that succeed. Thinking outside the box maybe a hackneyed management cliché but in reality the process is only achieved by risk takers who have a perception of the potential for failure and can accept the threat. Many entrepreneurs will state they learnt a lot from failures, and had many more failures than successes. Rarely does a pure academic qualification score as an essential ingredient.  James Dyson built thousands of prototypes that failed before he hit on the design for the Dyson vacuum cleaner. Richard Branson’s success in the Virgin brand has been almost an equal mix of success and failure with many of his enterprises receiving huge media attention on the launch only to disappear within a few years.  The key is the ability to see what works, what does not and to spot a solution to a problem that nobody else has thought of.

Lessons in class and home should include activities that allow children to make mistakes without ridicule or negative consequences. The joy of learning the correct way to solve a maths problem or complete a science experiment must allow children to see what can happen if they get it wrong and enjoy the learning buzz from the sense of achievement.

If we mollycoddle children by shielding their feelings from the opportunity to fail at school we may inadvertently prevent them from aspiring to greatness as adults. Better they learn to fall off the bike occasionally to experience the consequences. They will gain far greater experience and ability than have them ride with stabilisers for the rest of their lives.

Comment:

Renee Heath :

“I totally agree, my sister worked at a private school in LA where they didn’t even give test because they said it was too “stressful” for the children – how crazy is that!”

Childrens Failure In English Literacy and Numeracy Continue to Worry Governments and Employers.

Monday, April 5th, 2010

The attainment of children in English literacy and numeracy is a continuing concern for employers and educational authorities. The recovery from global recession may be hampered by inadequately educated employees.

Those of us that can read will be shocked to learn of the excessive number of children that leave primary and secondary school without the minimal grasp of English literacy. This concern affects more that the just UK, so what is wrong with our modern teaching resources?

Perhaps the greatest concern of the Department of Children Schools and Families (DCSF) is the continuing poor standards in English. Children are leaving primary school with inadequate criterion to perform in secondary school. The transfer can overwhelm children who find continuing education in all subjects a struggle. The net effect is a barrage of children attempting to enter the employment market with inadequate standards in literacy and numeracy.

Chief Executives berate the educational system claiming that to employ the workforce they need they are forced to provide lessons in basic literacy and numeracy to new employees. But the problem is not unique to the UK. Six million Australians also don’t have the necessary basic literacy or numeracy skills needed in the workplace. Skills Australia have just released figures that equate to 40 per cent of Australians in work and 60 per cent of those unemployed have inadequate educational standards.

Technology is a double edged sword in the circumstances. Education can benefit from the myriad of technology based teaching resources that are now available. But technology is also removing the lower order of employment opportunities. The general move in employment is towards jobs requiring higher levels of education leaving the failing children trapped. This is bad news all round as employers, failing to find the correct quality and quantity of employees, will struggle to meet the opportunities emerging in a recovery from a global recession

Quick Search

Advanced search help

Our twitter account.

Email Signup

for News and Product Updates

SSL
We're listed on ShopSafe Verified by visa